Safety & Testing
Are pacifier covers a choking or suffocation hazard?
ZONE
COVER
What counts as a "small part"?
The CPSC defines a choking hazard using a test cylinder that's 1.25″ wide and 2.25″ deep — roughly the size of a young child's fully expanded throat.
- If an item fits entirely inside the cylinder, it's classified a small part / choking hazard for kids under 3.
- Defined under 16 CFR 1501.4, the same rule used to test toys, rattles, and other children's products.
Why do pacifiers have holes, but covers don't?
16 CFR 1511 requires actual pacifiers to have 2+ ventilation holes because a pacifier's shield sits close to the small-parts size range for a product made to be sucked on. The holes are a breathing backup in case a pacifier ever becomes lodged in a baby's throat — a suffocation safeguard.
- The larger size of the pacifier cover (compared to a pacifier alone) lessens the same lodge-and-suffocate risk that the holes on the pacifier exist to guard against. The covers' size also moves them well beyond the CPSC small part standard.
Standards Our Product Was Tested Against & Passed
Report No. R261243 • Product Tested: Pacifier Covers • Customer: Perfect Paci LLC
Tested Age Grading: All Ages (0 Months+)
Performed by AM Testing & Services Inc., an A2LA-accredited laboratory (Cert. No. 3180.01, ISO/IEC 17025:2017)
Previous testing was also completed under Report No. R250759 Rev.2. Current safety details above reflect the most recent report.
- 16 CFR 1500 — Use & Abuse TestingPass
- 16 CFR 1501 — Small Parts TestingPass
- 16 CFR 1500.44 — FlammabilityPass
- CPSA Section 14(a)(5) / CPSIA Section 103 — Tracking LabelPass
- 19 CFR 134 — Country of OriginPass
- CPSIA Section 101; 15 USC 1278a — Total Lead in SubstratesPass
- CPSIA Section 108; 16 CFR 1307 — PhthalatesPass
- Washington / Maine — PhthalatePass
- California Prop. 65 — PhthalatesComplies
- California Prop. 65 — Lead & CadmiumComplies